FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT STRATEGIC MODEL TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING PROGRESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51453/2354-1431/2021/511Keywords:
Formative assessment, student assessment, assessment strategies, learning progress.Abstract
This article aims to overview and clarify the concept and role of formative assessment (FA) in student performance assessment, in which the strategic model of is emphasized to enhance the progress of learners. These strategies include sharing learning intentions, eliciting evidence of learning, self-assessment, peer assessment, feedback (Leahy, Lyon, Thompson and Wiliam, 2005). The results show that many studies have shown that teachers using these strategies of assessment will increase learners learning outcomes and enhance their learning progress.
Downloads
References
[1] Anthony, M. C., Lewis, D. (2008). Alternative Assessment: An Action Research Study on the use of Peer Assessment as a Learning Tool for Education Students in a University in Jamaica. Retrieved November 10, 2008, form Proquest from: http://www.waikato.ac.nz.
[2] Biggs, J. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: a role for summative assessment? Assessment in Education, 5: 103-110.
[3] Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86: 9–21.
[4] Black, P., Jones, J. (2006). Formative assessment and the learning and teaching of MFL: sharing the language learning road map with the learners. Language Learning Journal, 34(1): 4-9.
[5] Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education. 5(1): 7 - 71.
[6] Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2): 139-148.
[7] Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139-148.
[8] Black, P., Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1): 5-31.
[9] Bloom, B. S. (1969). Mastery learning evaluation comment (Vol. 1, no 2, May). Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles Center for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs
[10] Ministry of Education and Training. (2012). Vietnam Education Development Strategy 2011-2020.
[11] Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16: 193-200.
[12] Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M., Rachor, R. E. (1995). Teachers’ assessment practices: preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3: 159–179.
[13] Chappuis, S., Stiggins, R. (2002). Classroom Assessment for Learning. Educational Leadership Journal. Association for supervision and curriculum development. Retrieved May 20, 2008, from Proquest from:http://www.waikato.ac.nz.
[14] Clark, I. (2011). Formative Assessment: Policy, Perspectives and Pratices. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 4(2): 158-180.
[15] Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4): 438-481.Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., Herman, J. L. (2008). From evidence to action: A seamless process of formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3): 1-16.
[16] Crooks, T. J. (2001). The Validity of Formative Assessment. Educational Assessment Unit. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. A paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds, 13-15 September 2001.
[17] Dochy, F., Segers, M. (1999). The use of self-peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in higher Education, 23(3), 331-350.
[18] Fontana, D., Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64: 407-417.
[19] Gipps, C., Tunstall, P. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4): 389-404.
[20] Gregory, K, Cameron, C., Davis, A. (2000). Self-assessment and Goal Setting. Connections publishing, Merville, British Columbia, Canada.
[21] Harlen, Wynne., James, Mary. (1997). Assessment and Learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3): 365 - 379.
[22] Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on student learning. University of Auckland, New Zealand: Inaugural professorial lecture. In Crooks, T. (2001), The Validity of Formative assessment. Educational Assessment Research unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
[23] Henly, D. C. (2003). Use of Web-based formative assessment to support student learning in a metabolism/nutrition unit. European Journal of Dental Education, 7: 116-122
[24] Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2): 140-146.
[25] Herman, J., Osmundson, E., Silver, D. (2010). Capturing quality in formative assessment practice: Measurement challenges (Report No. 770). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
[26] Heywood, J. (2000). Assessment in higher education: Student learning, teaching, programs and institutions. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
[27] Hill, M. (1995). Self-assessment in primary school: A response to student teacher questions. Waikato Journal of Education. Department of Professional Studies, University of Waikato.
[28] Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom Assessment: Minute by Minute, Day by day. Educational Leadership Journal. 63(3).
[29] Marzano, R. J. (2010). Formative Assessment & Standards-Based Grading. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research Laboratory.
[30] Moss, C., Brookhart, S. (2009). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
[31] Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education. 31(2): 99-218.
[32] Noonan, B. & Duncan, C.R. (2005). Peer and Self-assessment in High Schools. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. University of Saskatchewan, 10(17): 1-8, ISSN 1531-7714. Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=17
[33] Olsen, S. J., Shields-Ramsey, P. (2010). Learning 360 Framework Participants Guide: Creating a Powerful Learning System. Midvale, UT: School Improvement Network, Inc.
[34] Osmond, P., Mery, S., Reiling, K. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using students derived marking criteria in peer and self- assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 27(4): 309- 323.
[35] Ramaprasad, A. (1983) On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28: 4 – 13.
[36] Rushton, A. (2005). Formative assessment: a key to deep learning? Medical Teacher. 27(6): 509 – 513.
[37] Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
[38] Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in education, 5(1): 77-84.
[39] Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, and M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, I: 39-83. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
[40] Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Rust, F. (2005). Assessment. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (275-326). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[41] Stiggins, R. (2005). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1).
[42] Stiggins, R. (2007). Assessment through the student's eyes. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 22-26.
[43] Stiggins, R., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2006). Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right - Using It Well. Portland, OR: Educational Testing Service.
[44] Stiggins, R., DuFour, R. (2009). Maximizing the power of formative assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9): 640-644.
[45] Taras, M. (2005). Assessment-summative and formative-some theoretical reflection. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4): 466-478.
[46] Wininger, R. S. (2005). Using your tests to teach: Formative summative assessment. Teaching Psychology, 32(2): 164-166.
[47] Young, E. (2005). Assessment for Learning: Embedding and extending. Assessment is for Learning. Retrieved October 10th, 2008, from Proquest, from: http://www.waikato.ac.nz.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in SJTTU are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and SJTTU, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to SJTTU to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to SJTTU, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.
