A STUDY ON ANTONYMY IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51453/2354-1431/2024/1234Keywords:
Antonymy, English antonyms, Vietnamese antonyms, Linguistic analysisAbstract
This research presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of antonymy in English and Vietnamese, examining the linguistic and cultural dimensions that shape opposite relationships in both languages. The study employs a systematic approach to investigate how antonyms function within these distinct linguistic systems, focusing on their semantic properties, structural patterns, and contextual applications. Through extensive analysis of data collected from authoritative dictionaries, literary works, and contemporary texts, this research explores various categories of antonyms and their distribution across different semantic fields. The findings reveal both universal patterns and language-specific characteristics in antonymic relationships. While both languages demonstrate conventional binary oppositions, Vietnamese exhibits unique patterns influenced by cultural conceptualization and social contexts, particularly in areas related to social relationships and abstract concepts. The research highlights how cultural perspectives significantly influence the formation and interpretation of antonymic pairs in Vietnamese, creating subtle variations that differ from English counterparts. These distinctions reflect deeper cultural-linguistic relationships that impact communication and translation practices. The study contributes to theoretical understanding of cross-linguistic antonymy and offers practical insights for language teaching, translation studies, and intercultural communication. Furthermore, the findings enhance our comprehension of how cultural frameworks shape linguistic structures, particularly in the expression of opposing concepts across different language systems.
Downloads
References
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Hoang, T. T. (2005). Basic English lexicology. Hanoi National University Publishing House.
Jones, S. (2002). Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 191–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203166253
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Mohammad, S. M., Dorr, B. J., Hirst, G., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Computing lexical contrast. Computational Linguistics, 39(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00143
Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy, and other paradigms. Cambridge University Press.
Paradis, C., Willners, C., & Jones, S. (2015). Good and bad opposites: Using textual and experimental techniques to measure antonym canonicity. The Mental Lexicon, 10(3), 380–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.3.04par
Rashaad, R. D. (2022). A Literature Review on Antonymy in English. Journal of Anbar University for Languages & Literature/Magallat Gami'at Al-Anbar Li-Lugat Wa-al-Adabl, (35). https://doi.org/10.37654/aujll.2022.176324
Saleem, A. P. D. H. S. (2023). The Role of Synonyms and Antonyms in Speaking and Writing. Journal of Language Studies, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.25130/lang.7.3.22
To, M. T. (2007). English semantics. NXB Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in SJTTU are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and SJTTU, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to SJTTU to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to SJTTU, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.